A leading computer scientist believes one of the most controversial theories in modern science could actually strengthen Christianity rather than undermine it.

Rizwan Virk, who studied computer science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), argues that if humanity is one day proven to be living inside a computer simulation, it would not disprove the Bible but instead offer a modern explanation for many of its central teachings.

The simulation hypothesis proposes that what humans perceive as physical reality is actually an artificial world generated by an advanced intelligence, much like an immensely sophisticated video game.

‘The religions were trying to tell us that it’s some kind of simulation, and that the soul is the player of the game,’ Virk told the Daily Mail.

According to Virk, many of Christianity’s core beliefs fit naturally within that framework. He believes the soul exists outside the simulated world as the true ‘player,’ while the human body functions as its avatar.

In his view, the biblical Book of Life resembles a complete recording of every action taken inside the simulation, while the life review reported by many near-death experiencers mirrors replaying those recorded events after death.

Virk also compared the Genesis account of God creating the universe by speaking to the way modern AI systems generate virtual worlds through simple prompts.

‘So I think that it’s more likely we’re in a simulated world if Christianity is true, or even if any of the other religions are essentially true,’ he said.

The theory entered mainstream scientific debate in 2003 when Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom argued that if future civilizations become capable of creating simulations indistinguishable from reality, it becomes statistically plausible that humanity is already living inside one.

Read More: MIT scientist explains how the theory we’re living in a simulation could prove Christianity right