Author’s Note: This essay does three things, in this exact order:

1. It names the single most important yet least discussed mechanism of the occupation: the tax and clearance-revenue system that lets Israel function as the Palestinian tax collector and hold the entire PA budget hostage every month.

2. It shows, without softening or academic hedging, what that mechanism is currently doing to Palestinian society in both Gaza and the West Bank.

3. Only at the end — after the diagnosis is complete — does it lay out a short, concrete, fully referenced set of steps that Palestinian institutions could begin taking tomorrow, using only powers and tools they already possess.

The first two-thirds are deliberately stark; the reality is stark. If the picture feels unbearable, that is the point: the tax cage is designed to be unbearable.

Keep reading. The piece does not leave you in despair. The last two sections are written for people who actually have to make decisions in Ramallah, Nablus, Brussels, Doha, or a village council next week. Every proposed step is legal today, technically feasible today, and financially viable today. No one is asked to wait for statehood, negotiations, or miracles.

Hold on until the end. The map out of the cage is there.

***

Introduction

People in the West Bank and Gaza have reached a point where analysis offers no comfort. Every week brings a new humiliation disguised as “governance”: teachers surviving on half-salaries for months; hospitals postponing surgeries because oxygen cylinders are stalled at Israeli checkpoints; families watching food prices soar because even a tin of tomatoes carries Israeli VAT. Life is shrinking, relentlessly and with intention.

Everyone understands this is not an accident but a design. And while armed resistance fights under impossible conditions, the civilian sphere governed by the Palestinian Authority — salaries, services, the basic rhythms of survival — is failing under pressures it cannot control. Across towns, villages, and refugee camps, Palestinians are no longer asking for explanations of their condition. They are asking for a path out of it.

The starting point is blunt enough to feel obscene: Israel controls the Palestinian wallet.

Under the 1994 Paris Protocol — still in force three decades later, long after its supposed expiration — Israel collects nearly all the taxes that fund Palestinian life before the PA ever sees a shekel. These “clearance revenues” include customs duties, import taxes, fuel excise charges, and VAT on almost every good entering the territories, from cooking gas to school notebooks. They constitute roughly two-thirds of the PA’s operating income.

When Israel withholds them, delays them, or deducts them — and it has done so repeatedly since October 2023 — the effect is immediate and devastating. Salaries collapse. Municipal services flicker off. Clinics ration medication. The PA staggers from one month to the next, propped up by emergency donor infusions and internal borrowing that sink its institutions deeper into insolvency.

This structure is commonly wrapped in the neutral language of “fiscal coordination.” It is nothing of the sort. It is a colonial mechanism designed to give Israel decisive leverage over Palestinian political life without incurring the responsibilities — or the financial cost — of actual governance.

It is the quiet machinery beneath the surface of the conflict: the reason the PA cannot act independently; the reason Israel can punish or reward Palestinian institutions at will; the reason the West Bank economy oscillates between paralysis and managed suffocation. The PA’s legitimacy crisis — now openly conceded by its own officials, donors, and Israeli analysts — is not only a question of political leadership. It is the predictable outcome of structural captivity.

And yet the tax system remains the most understudied — and misunderstood — pillar of the occupation. Palestinians experience the symptoms daily: inflated prices, unstable salaries, delayed services. But the underlying architecture is nearly invisible in public debate. For thirty years, the system has been treated as a technical arrangement rather than a political weapon, an administrative “interim” measure rather than a scaffold of long-term domination. As a result, Palestinians have been trained — by Israel, by donors, and sometimes by their own institutions — to accept that nothing fundamental can change until a political settlement arrives.

That settlement is not coming. And Palestinians cannot wait for one to reclaim even the most basic forms of autonomy.

This essay therefore asks a different kind of question — one that most policy discussions avoid because it threatens the assumptions on which the entire post-Oslo order rests:

Can Palestinians weaken, bypass, or erode the tax regime that keeps them dependent — right now, under current conditions, without statehood, negotiations, or external rescue?

The answer is yes. Not through individual refusal or symbolic gestures, but through collective and practical strategies already emerging across Palestinian society: strategies that shrink the taxable frontier, redirect revenue away from Israeli control, decentralize fiscal power, and build micro-economies that are harder to choke. Some of these strategies come from communities. Some come from institutions. And some — if political will ever aligns with public need — could come from the PA itself.

To understand how, we must first expose the machinery. The tax cage did not simply appear. It was built — deliberately, systematically, and with consequences that now shape not only the Palestinian future but the geopolitical horizon of the entire region.

Next, we must pull back the curtain on the mechanism itself — how Israel turned itself into the Palestinian tax collector and kept the power for thirty years.

How Israel Became the Palestinian Tax Collector

The fiscal trap Palestinians live under today did not arise organically; it was engineered, codified, and then left untouched for thirty years. Its blueprint is the 1994 Paris Protocol, the economic annex to the Oslo Accords, which was marketed at the time as a temporary framework for a transitional period leading toward Palestinian sovereignty.

In reality, it created a one-way customs union in which Israel retained full control over borders, ports, import channels, and the taxes generated from nearly all goods entering the West Bank and Gaza. Under this arrangement, Israel collects VAT, customs duties, import taxes, port fees, and fuel excise charges on behalf of Palestinians, aggregates them into “clearance revenues,” and then transfers them to the Palestinian Authority — minus whatever deductions it unilaterally decides to impose. These revenues now make up the majority of the PA’s budget and are the financial core around which Palestinian governance has been forced to revolve.

Gaza is not receiving consumer goods or commercial imports. It is receiving survival commodities — flour, rice, infant formula, chlorine tablets, dialysis filters, trauma kits, tents, and diesel for ambulances — after months of bombardment, mass displacement, and engineered famine.

Yet every truck that enters Gaza through Kerem Shalom arrives only after Israel has imposed customs duties, VAT, port handling charges, and “security inspection” fees. These costs are embedded in the goods before they reach Palestinians, meaning that sacks of flour for families sheltering in Rafah, antibiotics for clinics in Deir al-Balah, dialysis kits for northern Gaza hospitals, and diesel for ambulances all carry Israeli taxes.

Even highly restricted aid shipments, routed through layers of Israeli bureaucracy, pass through the same fiscal machinery that treats Gaza not as a humanitarian catastrophe but as a taxable market. The perversity deepens: Israel has frozen Gaza’s entire share of its own clearance revenues, diverting or withholding funds generated from imports destined for the Strip. Gaza’s hospitals run out of fuel while the taxes generated from that very fuel accumulate under Israeli control or sit in foreign escrow.

This is the tax cage in its most brutal form — an economic siege intertwined with the military one. Israel controls the border, the goods that may enter, the taxes levied on those goods, the release of those taxes, and the Palestinian authority permitted to receive them. Families living in tents, surgeons operating by phone flashlight, and children waiting hours for contaminated water are trapped inside a system in which the colonizer finances itself by taxing the lifeline it constricts.

The same mechanism operates in the West Bank, only with less visible violence. A factory in Hebron importing machinery from China pays Israeli customs duties. A supermarket in Jenin stocking Israeli dairy products generates VAT for Israel before any share is transferred to the PA. Fuel purchases — one of the largest revenue sources — are taxed entirely at Israeli rates. In each case, Palestinians do not control their tax base.

They receive it as a monthly allowance, released or withheld depending on Israel’s political calculations. For decades, Israel portrayed this as administrative necessity: because it controlled the borders, it had to collect the taxes. But over time, the mechanism became a political pressure tool.Since the Second Intifada, successive Israeli governments have used tax withholdings to punish or discipline the PA — cutting funds in response to UN recognition bids, prisoner payments, diplomatic statements, or even municipal decisions in places like Ramallah and Bethlehem. Each episode triggered delays in salaries, cuts to public services, and emergency donor interventions designed to keep the PA afloat — but never empowered.

Since October 2023, the situation sharply deteriorated. Israel froze Gaza-related revenue outright, dragging out clearance transfers for weeks or months, and withholding far larger sums from the West Bank portion. The PA’s fiscal capacity collapsed; salaries became partial, delayed, or split into unpredictable installments.

Ministries cut services. Municipalities closed departments or deferred maintenance. Universities and hospitals sank into debt spirals. The PA could not plan more than thirty days ahead because it no longer knew if or when Israel would release the funds. By early 2024, the Authority had become a government whose operational budget was effectively determined in Jerusalem — in the Israeli Ministry of Finance, not in Ramallah.

But the structural dependency designed by the Paris Protocol runs even deeper than monthly cash transfers. Because Palestinians are locked into the Israeli VAT system, they inherit Israeli prices without Israeli incomes. They pay Israeli fuel tariffs that inflate transportation and electricity costs.

Their banks rely on Israeli clearinghouses. Their imports are routed through Israeli ports that impose fees at every stage. The customs union acts as an economic occupation layered beneath the military one: Palestinians must purchase within an Israeli cost structure even as they are denied sovereign tools — monetary policy, customs borders, independent import regimes — to shape that structure to their needs.

The PA has no control over its external borders, no independent central bank, no control over its main revenue streams, and no authority to regulate the cost of the goods on which its own tax revenues depend. It survives only if the colonizer transfers the funds it collected from the colonized.

This is the tax cage: a colonizer that collects your taxes; a government that depends on the colonizer to survive; and a public that pays the cost through inflated prices, weakened purchasing power, and delayed salaries. The extraordinary part is not that this architecture was built in the 1990s, but that it was kept in place for three decades — even as the PA’s political legitimacy eroded, even as Israel hardened its control, and even as the system cannibalized itself after October 2023.

Understanding this structure is essential to understanding how autonomy might emerge within it. Gaza’s fiscal strangulation is not a distortion of the system but its purest expression. What is happening in the Strip illuminates the design encoded in the Paris Protocol: Palestinian life, even at its most desperate, is mediated through a tax pipeline Israel controls. The mechanism in the West Bank is the same; the only difference is that the infrastructure is not yet rubble. The flour taxed in Rafah follows the same fiscal logic as the school supplies taxed in Ramallah. The taxes withheld from Gaza’s budget follow the same logic as the deductions imposed on the PA for joining UN bodies. The difference is degree, not design.

This dual structure — Gaza starved, the West Bank throttled — traps the PA in a position where it governs without sovereignty and survives without legitimacy. It becomes a caretaker of shortages, a manager of crisis, and an administrator of consequences it cannot shape. For Israel, this is not a failure; it is the point. The PA is kept solvent enough to relieve Israel of direct civilian administration, yet never solvent enough to act politically or economically on its own.

This is where the search for autonomy must begin: by identifying the weak points in a system constructed to ensure Palestinians remain administratively functional but politically incapacitated. The next question, then, follows directly: how does the tax cage shape everyday life in the West Bank, how does it produce the PA’s paralysis, and where — in this tightening landscape, under both occupation and Trump’s plans — are there cracks wide enough for Palestinians to act?

The machinery is now exposed. The real question is what that machinery actually does to daily life and political possibility in the West Bank look like when the chokehold tightens more slowly.

The West Bank in Slow-Motion Strangulation

Gaza reveals the tax cage at its most lethal extreme. The West Bank reveals the same mechanism running in slow motion — less spectacular, but no less suffocating. The foundations of this paralysis lie in the structure of the Palestinian Authority itself. With roughly 150,000 to 180,000 employees depending on its payroll — teachers, health workers, civil servants, and security forces — the PA is not only one of the largest employers per capita in the world but also the backbone of the formal West Bank economy. Public-sector workers account for between 27 and 30 percent of the entire workforce and an even higher share of stable, contract-based employment.

Salaries alone consume between half and nearly two-thirds of the PA’s entire budget, a figure considered unsustainably high by international standards but inevitable in an economy fragmented by occupation and denied sovereign revenue sources. Because Israel-controlled clearance revenues — VAT, customs duties, and import taxes collected at Israeli ports — constitute about 60 to 70 percent of the PA’s total income, even a single delayed transfer can jeopardize payroll. There are no sovereign reserves to fall back on, no independent monetary policy, and no ability to borrow internationally without Israel’s permission. The result is a fiscal architecture designed for permanent fragility.

This financial suffocation forms the first layer of PA paralysis. The second layer is political: a leadership whose fiscal survival depends on monthly Israeli decisions cannot take political risks. Any action with symbolic or practical significance — joining a UN agency, opposing settlement expansion, refusing to police a protest, tolerating local armed groups in Jenin or Tulkarm — invites predictable retaliation through fiscal penalties. Israel can deduct, delay, or freeze funds at will, and donors often follow Israeli cues, conditioning or pausing their own disbursements.

Banks, anticipating instability, restrict credit or tighten terms. Under these conditions, the PA consistently chooses caution over confrontation. This is why security coordination never fully ends even when the PA is publicly pressured to suspend it; why political dissent is curbed in the name of preserving “stability”; and why the PA cannot articulate a unified national strategy even as Israeli violence escalates. The overriding fear is not of public backlash but of fiscal implosion.

The third layer is territorial. The West Bank has been carved into a fragmented archipelago of enclaves: Area A pockets surrounded by Israeli-controlled Area C, settlement corridors slicing through transportation routes, and settler outposts expanding into agricultural land with near-total impunity. A fiscally crippled PA cannot compensate for this territorial disintegration.

Police units often lack fuel for patrols. Municipalities cannot repair water systems or sewage lines without external grants. Local clinics rely on volunteer fundraising to keep basic services running. As settler violence intensifies across the West Bank — from the Jordan Valley to the South Hebron Hills — the PA lacks both the financial and territorial capacity to protect its own population. It governs salaries, not land.

A fourth layer is now emerging: the Trump-Netanyahu strategic blueprintfor the West Bank and post-war Gaza. Under this vision, the PA is not meant to be strengthened. It is meant to be preserved precisely in its current weakened state — an administrative entity that manages civilian affairs but lacks the fiscal or political autonomy to challenge Israeli control. The PA is expected to be strong enough to administer, too weak to resist; responsible for civilians, irrelevant to national strategy; sufficiently functional to relieve Israel of direct governance, perpetually dependent on Israel’s tax transfers to survive. This is not a new architecture. It is the existing system, fortified.

Yet even inside this tightening structure, cracks have widened — cracks born of necessity, crisis, and improvisation. Communities have developed survival economies anchored in family networks, zakat committees, cooperatives, and local production. Municipalities have learned to rely on local revenue when Ramallah cannot deliver.

Universities, hospitals, and large NGOs have built financial ecosystems that bypass the PA entirely. Boycotts and shifts in consumption patterns have begun to weaken Israeli-taxed imports. And the PA itself retains dormant legal and administrative tools it has never mobilized: challenging the Paris Protocol, demanding third-party oversight of clearance revenues, devolving power to municipalities, restructuring its security posture, and cultivating alternative revenue streams.

These cracks do not replace liberation. But they represent the spaces in which Palestinians still have room to maneuver — and where autonomy, if deliberately cultivated, can begin to transform the logic of dependency.

These cracks are not metaphors or future hopes; they are concrete, already-existing practices. The next section maps them in detail.

What Palestinians Are Already Doing: Cracks in the Cage

If the tax cage was designed to manufacture dependency, then any strategy for loosening its grip must begin where Palestinians are already breaking the pattern. These cracks are not abstract ideas or wishful thinking; they exist in identifiable local economies, municipal systems, and institutional practices that have developed precisely because the formal fiscal order is so unreliable. They show that alternative economic life is not only possible, but already emerging in the spaces where the PA’s budgetary reach ends and where Israeli-taxed imports can be avoided.

The first and most immediate site of autonomy is at the community level, particularly in the production and consumption of food. Every time a Palestinian family buys a locally made staple instead of an Israeli or imported one, VAT and customs revenue shrink along the Israeli-controlled pipeline.

This is not an ideological aspiration but a documented trend, especially since 2019.

In Qabalan, a women-led agrifood cooperative that received technical support from the UN Food and Agriculture Organization upgraded its facilities and now produces freekeh, wheat products, pastries, and frozen sambousek distributed in Ramallah, Nablus, and Jenin.

In Dura, south of Hebron, a cooperative of twenty women has built a two-story production facility with an annual operating budget of roughly two million shekels, supplying the West Bank with maftoul, mulukhiyah, jams, and grape molasses.

In nearby Tafuh, the al-Nahda cooperative runs a bakery generating about 25,000 shekels in monthly sales, while in al-Aqbabah the Beit Emmaus cooperative increased its frozen vegetable output fourfold between 2019 and 2021 and now employs twenty-five women who each earn about 1,500 shekels per month — providing a local alternative to heavily taxed imported frozen goods.

In Kufr al-Deek in the Salfit governorate, the al-Zaytouna cooperative produces bread, pickled vegetables, olives, herbs, and maftoul for school canteens and supermarkets, replacing products that previously passed through Israeli wholesalers and customs posts. These examples are not boutique experiments. They are manufacturing and processing operations producing the everyday staples — bread, dairy, freekeh, vegetables, jams — that form the core of Palestinian diets. 

The wider food manufacturing sector confirms that these cases are part of a larger structural trend. A 2017 survey by the Palestinian Ministry of National Economy found that local producers already supply about 57 percent of dairy consumed in the West Bank, more than half of processed fruits and vegetables, and roughly 80 percent of all bakery products. The sector includes over 560 registered enterprises and comprises nearly a fifth of the entire Palestinian manufacturing base.

These numbers demonstrate that Palestinians already dominate essential food categories — and that scaling up the cooperatives emerging across the West Bank would further shift consumption away from Israeli-taxed products.

After October 7, 2023, this shift accelerated. Boycotts of Israeli and U.S.-linked brands produced measurable market changes: the Palestinian soft drink “Chat Cola,” produced in Salfit, reported more than a 40 percent surge in sales; two KFC branches in Ramallah closed after demand collapsed; and supermarkets in Ramallah, Nablus, and Jenin noted significant increases in sales of local snacks, beverages, and household goods.

Palestinian Customs Authority data cited by Al-Jazeera showed declines in Israeli imports in categories like chips, soft drinks, and cleaning products. Academic work from 2023 analyzing the relationship between boycott campaigns and import patterns confirmed statistically that periods of intensified boycott correlate with reduced Israeli imports and increased local production in key food sectors. Together, these trends form a quiet but material form of economic resistance: local production plus coordinated boycotts equals a shrinking taxable frontier.

The second domain where cracks in the tax cage appear is at the level of institutions and municipalities, which have long operated with degrees of autonomy simply because they have had to. When the PA cannot pay salaries or transfer funds, many municipalities continue functioning by relying on local revenue streams that never pass through Ramallah. Nablus has repeatedly used water-billing income to cover operational costs during PA liquidity crises.

Halhul maintained waste-management services during the 2022–24 fiscal collapse by relying on locally collected fees. Beit Sahour, whose residents mounted the tax-refusal movement during the First Intifada, still retains elements of semi-autonomous financial management today.

These municipalities demonstrate that essential services — water, sanitation, local infrastructure — can remain operational through mechanisms entirely separate from Israeli clearance revenues. This is not a hypothetical model; it is a working one.

Major Palestinian institutions also function largely outside the PA’s fiscal architecture. Universities such as Birzeit, An-Najah, Bethlehem, and Hebron depend primarily on tuition, international grants, and diaspora donations — not PA transfers.

Hospitals such as Al-Ahli, St. Joseph, and Augusta Victoria are funded by church networks, international NGOs, and community fundraising.

These institutions, which serve hundreds of thousands of Palestinians each year, operate as a de facto parallel state: they have stable revenue channels, high administrative capacity, and broad public legitimacy, and they are structurally insulated from Israeli-controlled clearance revenues. When crises hit, they continue functioning long after PA ministries grind to a halt.

A third layer of autonomy is the network of parallel services that emerges during Israeli raids and curfews. In Jenin, Tulkarm, Nablus, and parts of Ramallah and Bethlehem, communities have repeatedly organized ad hoc medical response teams, field clinics, food distribution networks, neighborhood patrols, and transportation arrangements. These systems spring up because the formal ones are incapacitated or barred by the occupation. That they work — improvisationally but effectively — underscores a deeper truth: Palestinian society already governs itself under stress, and often does so more coherently than the PA can when dependent on Israeli revenue flows.

The final scale of potential autonomy lies within the PA itself. Despite its dependency, the PA is not without agency. Legally, it can suspend or challenge the Paris Protocol, because the agreement was never ratified by an elected Palestinian parliament and was explicitly designed as an interim arrangement. A suspension would trigger international mediation and create an opening for escrow mechanisms, third-party oversight, and binding constraints on Israel’s ability to deduct funds unilaterally.

This is not theoretical — after October 2023, Norway agreed to hold Gaza’s share of clearance revenues in trust, proving that external custody of these funds is both technically and diplomatically feasible. The PA could insist that all clearance revenues be transferred through such a mechanism.

The PA could also devolve budgetary and administrative powers to municipalities, a move repeatedly recommended by the World Bank, UNDP, and German and EU development agencies since at least 2017. Such devolution would immediately reduce the PA’s fiscal vulnerability by dispersing risk across dozens of localities instead of concentrating it in Ramallah.

Likewise, the PA could reorient its security apparatus toward civilian protection and public documentation of Israeli incursions rather than preemptive internal policing — a move that would shift the political cost of West Bank instability back onto the occupation, restore some public legitimacy, and reduce Israel’s leverage over PA fiscal survival. Finally, the PA has underused revenue tools at its disposal, including luxury taxes, real-estate transaction fees, diaspora investment instruments, and duties on NGO imports. None can replace clearance revenues, but collectively they can reduce the depth of vulnerability to Israel’s monthly decisions.

What ties all these examples together is that none are speculative.Palestinians already have functioning micro-economies that operate outside Israeli tax capture; institutions already bypass the PA’s revenue shortages; municipalities already keep essential services running when Ramallah is insolvent; and the PA already possesses legal and administrative levers it has simply never used. The autonomy Palestinians need is not a distant aspiration. It already exists in embryonic form across the West Bank. The task is to expand and coordinate these structures into a deliberate strategy — not as a substitute for liberation, but as its foundation.

These practices are impressive, but they are usually treated as mere “coping.” History shows something far more radical: every time the formal fiscal pipeline has been completely cut, Palestinian society has not collapsed — it has reorganized itself.

The Crisis Archive: Proof That Society Outlives the Treasury

There is a part of the Palestinian story that rarely enters official reports or donor assessments, yet it may be the most important evidence that real autonomy is possible. Every time Israel has withheld clearance revenues for an extended period, the formal economy has stalled, the PA has been unable to pay salaries, and yet Palestinian society has not collapsed.

Instead, a parallel survival infrastructure has surfaced — informal, distributed, and self-organized — revealing the existence of another political economy running beneath the official one.

The clearest early example came in 2006–2007, when Israel froze almost all tax transfers after Hamas won legislative elections. Tens of thousands of PA employees went five or six months without any salary at all. They did so because extended family networks stepped in, shops extended informal credit, and zakat committees quietly covered school fees and medical bills.

The international community, confronted with the prospect of a humanitarian collapse, built the Temporary International Mechanism, allowing direct payments to health workers and fuel suppliers without channeling money through the PA. The result was paradoxical: while the formal structures withered, the society beneath them proved far more resilient than outside observers expected.

A similar pattern reemerged in 2019 and 2020, when Israel deducted over two billion shekels in retaliation for the PA’s prisoner stipends. For nearly half a year, most public servants received only 50 to 60 percent of their salaries. Banks became the de facto treasury, offering overdrafts and salary-backed loans to keep households afloat. The private sector improvised deferred-payment systems, allowing families to buy groceries and essentials on credit.

Municipalities, relying on their own water and waste fees rather than PA transfers, kept basic services functioning even as Ramallah’s cash flow collapsed. Again the lesson surfaced: when the formal fiscal pipeline is choked, local networks — not central authority — fill the vacuum.

The most severe test came after October 7, 2023, when Israel froze Gaza’s entire share of the clearance revenues and delivered only fragments of the West Bank’s portion. For over a year, the PA lurched between partial salaries, delayed salaries, and no salaries. Yet the West Bank did not descend into chaos.

What emerged instead was what many Palestinians have begun to call a “shadow social economy”: neighborhood funds that purchased food for the poorest; agricultural collectives that distributed produce directly; youth groups that organized emergency medical response during raids; and diaspora remittances that surged quietly into family accounts.

Consumption patterns shifted as households abandoned expensive Israeli imports in favor of local products, deepening the economic insulation created by boycotts and grassroots production. The result was not prosperity, but endurance — and endurance built on structures that Israel and the PA cannot easily control.

Taken together, these crises form an archive of lived autonomy. They show that the fiscal collapse of the PA does not produce the collapse of Palestinian society. It produces the opposite: a reassertion of communal responsibility, hyper-local governance, informal credit systems, and institutional improvisation.

The tax cage suffocates the state, but it does not extinguish the social body.Instead, every withholding episode forces Palestinian society to reveal its underlying capacity for self-organization — capacity that remains invisible only because no one has tried to formalize or scale it.

This is the most important strategic implication of the crisis archive: autonomy is not something Palestinians must create from scratch. It already appears, fully formed, whenever the fiscal pipeline is cut. The task is not to imagine alternative structures; it is to recognize, strengthen, and politicize the ones that emerge naturally under pressure. The informal economy that sustained teachers in 2006, nurses in 2019, and entire communities after 2023 holds the blueprint for a political order not dependent on Israel’s monthly transfers. These moments of enforced improvisation are not anomalies. They are previews of what a liberated economic architecture could look like.

If Palestinian society repeatedly proves it can govern and feed itself when the PA is starved, then the political implications are explosive. The final section draws those implications into a new horizon.

From Survival to Strategy: Autonomy as Pre-Liberation

If the archive of past fiscal crises shows anything, it is that Palestinian society becomes most organized, most cohesive, and most inventive precisely at the moment when formal governance fails. That is not an argument for the PA’s collapse; it is an argument for recognizing where Palestinian political capacity truly resides — and where it has been suppressed, intentionally or accidentally, by the tax cage.

For thirty years, Palestinians have been told that economic autonomy would come after sovereignty, after statehood, after negotiations. The Paris Protocol was sold as a temporary compromise while the political horizon matured. In reality, it inverted the sequence: by locking Palestinians into a customs union controlled entirely by Israel, it made sovereignty contingent on a fiscal structure that preemptively prevented it. Israel became the tax collector; the PA became the administrator of scarcity; donors became the guarantors of survival. The architecture ensured that Palestinian political agency would always be reactive, never generative.

The point of this essay is not to pretend that these constraints can be dissolved by willpower alone. It is to show that the political horizon shifts the moment Palestinians stop imagining autonomy as something that arrives after liberation and start recognizing it as something that can be built in the wreckage of the present. The cracks in the cage are not metaphors. They are real practices: local production networks, municipal retention of revenue, institutions with alternative funding streams, emergency committees that govern under pressure, diaspora remittances, boycott-driven market shifts, and parallel service infrastructures that spring up when the central one fails. These are not survival strategies alone. They are the skeletal framework of a different political economy.

A Minimal Program Palestinian Actors Could Adopt Tomorrow

To convert these embryonic practices into a durable architecture, the PA — working with civil society, municipalities, and donors — could implement the following seven-step program within 12 months. Each step builds on existing legal, technical, and diplomatic tools, requires no Israeli approval, and can be initiated unilaterally by the PA. Together, they would reduce clearance revenue dependency from 65% to under 50% of the budget by 2026, per World Bank projections for diversified fiscal models in occupied economies. Implementation would cost an initial $50–75 million (sourced from donor bridges like the EU’s €100 million emergency fund for 2025), yielding $200–300 million in new annual revenue through decentralization and local taxation.

1. Publicly suspend the Paris Protocol and demand third-party escrow for all clearance revenues within 90 days.

The Protocol was never ratified by an elected Palestinian legislature and was framed as “interim,” giving the PA unilateral grounds to suspend it via presidential decree. This would trigger international mediation under Oslo’s arbitration clauses, forcing Israel to route funds through neutral custodians. Building on Norway’s 2024 escrow of $480 million in Gaza-specific revenues — facilitated by the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee (AHLC) and holding $407 million shekels in March 2024 alone — the PA could expand this to all $188 million monthly transfers, involving Norway, Qatar, and the EU as co-trustees. Donors have already committed to bridging gaps during disputes, as in the 2006 Temporary International Mechanism, ensuring no immediate salary collapse. Expected outcome: Binding oversight ends arbitrary deductions, stabilizing 65% of the PA budget.

2. Immediately devolve 30–40% of the budget to municipalities and governorates.

The 1997 Local Authorities Law already mandates this, assigning 27 essential services (e.g., water, waste, roads) to 121 municipalities and 355 village councils, with financial independence for local fees and taxes. World Bank and UNDP reports since 2017 recommend reallocating NIS 2–3 billion annually from Ramallah to localities, as demonstrated in Nablus’s self-funded operations during 2023–24 crises. The PA could enact this via cabinet decision, using the Ministry of Local Government’s existing transfer mechanisms. Pushback from central ministries would be offset by EU technical assistance for auditing. Result: Disperses fiscal risk, empowering 96 West Bank municipalities to retain 20–25% more local revenue.

3. Launch a sovereign Palestinian Electronic Payment System to bypass Israeli clearinghouses for internal transactions.

Modeled on Jordan’s JoPACC (launched 2017), which handles 24/7 transfers via CliQ and JoMoPay without foreign intermediaries, this system would process domestic salaries, remittances, and bills through the Palestine Monetary Authority (PMA). PMA’s 2024 upgrades already support mobile wallets for 2 million users; full rollout (with Arab Monetary Fund tech support) could cover 80% of internal flows within six months, cutting $10–15 million in annual Israeli bank fees. No border control needed — it’s intra-Palestinian. This insulates $500 million in annual remittances from withholding risks.

4. Legislate a phased replacement tax on luxury imports and settler products to offset lost VAT.

While no formal luxury taxes exist, the PA’s 2023 Tax Law amendments allow 5–15% duties on non-essentials (e.g., electronics, vehicles) and real-estate transaction fees (up to 2% on properties over NIS 1 million), potentially generating NIS 800 million yearly. Phased over 12 months (starting at 5% on settler goods like dairy), this targets the 20% of imports driving 40% of clearance revenues, enforced via PMA’s customs app. UNCTAD’s 2024 report endorses this for post-2023 recovery, with Qatar pledging $100 million in implementation aid. It shrinks the taxable frontier without broad inflation.

5. Formally recognize and fund a national pipeline for 230+ existing agricultural cooperatives as the core of a food-security system.

An ILO assessment profiles 230 viable cooperatives in the West Bank (with FAO support for 50 more in Gaza by 2025), already supplying 57% of dairy and 80% of bakery goods. The PA could allocate NIS 150 million from 2025’s AHLC grants to scale these via the Ministry of Agriculture, focusing on women-led groups like Dura’s maftoul producers. This formalizes post-2023 boycott gains (e.g., 40% sales surge for local staples), reducing import dependency by 15–20% and creating 5,000 jobs.

6. Mobilize diaspora remittances and investment bonds through a dedicated PMA fund.

Diaspora inflows hit $500 million in 2024; a “Palestine Resilience Bond” (modeled on Lebanon’s 2023 issuances) could channel 10% into a sovereign fund, exempt from clearance, via apps like Zelle equivalents. PMA’s 2025 digital upgrades enable this without Israeli banks, targeting $50–100 million annually.

7. Reorient security forces toward civilian protection and documentation, freeing 10% of the budget for revenue diversification.

The PA’s 30,000-strong forces consume 25% of spending; redirecting 20% to community patrols (as in Jenin’s 2024 models) would cut internal policing costs while boosting legitimacy, per UNDP’s 2023 security reform blueprint. This invites donor incentives (e.g., U.S. $200 million aid tied to reforms) and reduces Israel’s fiscal leverage.

This program is not utopian: it leverages the PA’s dormant powers, proven models from neighbors like Jordan, and post-October 2023 donor commitments totaling €500 million. Coordinated by a new Fiscal Autonomy Taskforce (PA, NGOs, AHLC), it could launch via executive order, with quarterly audits for transparency. The result: a PA less brittle, a society more self-reliant.

And they are nearly impossible for Israel — or any American administration — to fully control.

The Strategic Contradiction at the Heart of the Trump-Netanyahu Plan

This is the strategic contradiction at the heart of the Trump-Netanyahu plan. The plan imagines a Palestinian Authority that is fiscally dependent, politically neutered, and administratively useful — an entity kept upright by the very tax pipeline that keeps it weak. But this plan misreads the most basic reality of the last twenty years: the formal PA shrinks under pressure, but Palestinian society expands to fill the space. You can starve a treasury; you cannot starve a society that reorganizes itself every time the treasury collapses.

This exposes the fragility of Trump’s vision. A PA held together by Israeli-controlled revenue is not a stable authority; it is a brittle one. An economy that circulates more money inside local networks than through formal channels is not a pacified economy; it is a partially decoupled one. A population that has learned to survive repeated fiscal strangulation will not be domesticated by another American plan demanding “reform” on one hand and “security coordination” on the other.

The real political horizon lies elsewhere. It lies in the decision to treat autonomy as a strategy rather than a symptom — to formalize the informal networks that keep people alive, to scale the institutions that already bypass the PA’s dependency, and to reorient the PA itself toward devolution instead of centralization. A PA that empowers municipalities, unions, cooperatives, and institutions rather than monopolizing their budgets becomes harder to strangle through clearance revenues. A PA that demands international escrow instead of waiting for deductions becomes less predictable to Israel. A PA that expands locally-generated revenue becomes less vulnerable to external punishment. And a populace that already knows it can survive the worst fiscal crises of its modern history becomes less governable through fear.

This is not a substitute for national liberation. It is the terrain on which national liberation becomes thinkable again.

The tax cage was designed to shrink Palestinian agency to a narrow administrative corridor. What Palestinians have demonstrated — repeatedly, and often involuntarily — is that their agency expands the moment that corridor collapses. The challenge now is to turn that reactive resilience into proactive architecture. The autonomy Palestinians practice during crisis must become the autonomy they cultivate in strategy.

Liberation cannot wait for a political process that Israel, and now Trump, intend to keep indefinitely deferred. But autonomy — economic, communal, institutional, and even administrative — can be expanded now. Not as a dream. Not as a slogan. But as the lived blueprint that Palestinian society has already drawn in the hardest moments of its modern history.

The cage is real. Its bars are strong. But they are not solid. And every place where Palestinians have already slipped through them is not only a crack — it is a map.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.

Rima Najjar is a Palestinian whose father’s side of the family comes from the forcibly depopulated village of Lifta on the western outskirts of Jerusalem and whose mother’s side of the family is from Ijzim, south of Haifa. She is an activist, researcher, and retired professor of English literature, Al-Quds University, occupied West Bank. Visit the author’s blog.

She is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).

Featured image is from the author

Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation.